Was Legal Too
People forget- there was a 'leader' in the country. He was the President. The "Furer" meaning leader. He had, by an instrumentality of the state under direction of the state a 'program' in which a segment of the population was blamed for the economic ills of the country. They were too taxing to the country's budget.
So he, by use of the country's rules, laws, powers and agencies, expended resources budgetarily alloted to set up camps and exterminate six million people.
It was at the time ALL LEGAL.
Legal clearly does not mean Moral.
So the abortion arguments that the Supreme Court has rendered all this Legal, therefore the government can allot hundreds of millions of dollars to setting up 'surgical' clinics to effect abortions-targetting a group of people for the economic ills, personally taxing economically people- the entire class of the unborn-does not answer the question is it MORAL? Is it MORAL to nuke off 45-50 Million people you think get in the way of a personal economic agenda? How is that not a state fostered Holocaust when the government heavily subsidizes it?
PEACE ON EARTH
GOODWILL TOWARD ALL MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, BORN AND UNBORN
Saturday, April 09, 2011
EVERYTHING
IS POSSIBLE THROUGH THE LOVE OF CHRIST Even Resurrection from the living Dead. EVERYTHING. http://smallbusiness.aol.com/2011/03/14/my-first-million-bob-williamson-horizon-software-international/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl7%7Csec1_lnk3%7C55085
Mandatory Reading Before the Senate Vote
Because I know you don't read the Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/28/quietly-racking-up-the-abortion-toll/?page=1
Hillary's DisConnect
Stuns African American Anti-Abortionists. Saying "I admire Margaret Sanger enormously" for all the great stuff she did for the women's movement is like telling Jews "I admire Hitler greatly" because he was such a popular mass mobilizing charismatic figure that raised Germany from the humiliation of the Versailles Treaty. Margaret Sanger popularized and institutionalized a force of genocide that forced changes in the legal landscape that has allowed us to witness 45 Million dead pre-born infants since 1973-at a rate of three to one, African Americans over non-blacks. It is a holocaust. Mostly of poor people of color. Time the country got real. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html
Victories
Shallow or Real The government won't shut down. Some compromises were reached- DC won't get any federal money for abortions. DC will get federal money for school vouchers. Those look great on paper. The issue with the Planned Parenthood business is that when money is given to them, under the pretext that they only do a small percentage of abortions (doubtful and numbers vary depending on their defenders) is that the clear laws against federal funding of abortions are cleverly circumvented by allocations to the corporation which has no accountability regarding which funds are or are not used for the prohibited purpose. The primary purpose of planned parenthood is not general overall health care for women. They are not staffed by gynological specialists. They are staffed by abortion doctors. Go look for yourself. They don't even have state pharmaceutical licenses and yet act like dispensaries for abortion pills. If you give 300 Mil. to a corporation, a private corporation, with national tentacles, and have no contraints or regulations or oversight regarding where the money goes, it is going to circumvent the ban on no federal funding for abortions. Suppose the abortion doctors are on monthly retainers and they also do pelvic exams and pap smears once a month, but 100 times a month they are performing abortions. The retainer is circumventing federal funding for abortions-and calling it a pap smear. The logic of the people who just want to throw 300 Mil to Planned Parenthood is just obviously transparently fraudulent. And people see through it. There will be serious consequences to pay if in any future vote planned parenthood is not defunded but given a budgetary pass- millions and millions of dollars for what? The Senate looks like it's padding its own pocket and campaign coffers at the expense of women and the law. This isn't as clear as everyone thinks. And no, I don't believe for five seconds that Planned Parenthood only has three percent of its budget "invested" in abortion. Not for a New York minute.
Perception is everything
When You Are Blinded By Your Own Piety
There was once a professional who thought he was being religiously persecuted as an evangelical Christian at his high level job. His co-workers on the other hand claim that he had been just objectively offensive, insulting and rude repeatedly. It was personality and had nothing to do with evangelizing. Every time some incident occurred the client thought it was the religious persecution (and he was owed money under a statute precluding it) and the coworkers insisted on their belief that he was just being a jerk and most unChristian. It was impossible for the protagonist to see beyond his paradigm construction and try to see things from the other side's perspective. The more heated it got, the more money he demanded.
I look at that scenario and look at what happened over the Planned Parenthood abortion riders in the budget impasse. The Planned Parenthood people kept insising that they -the bad republicans- were just trying to 'throw women under the bus' and deny and deprive them of free "health care", which included abortion. The other side insisted that abortion is not "health care" for anyone, it is murder of a pre-born yet quite human life, and all the other so called 'benefits' offered by Planned Parenthood for women like mammograms, cancer screenings, etc. were smokescreens, overstated statistically and further, any money supposedly going to that 'free health care' would funnel into abortions one way or another as the clinics expanded exponentially as money is fungible.
The "they are throwing women under the bus" side could not see that abortion is damaging and dangerous to women, and done in unregulated places like Planned Parenthood is outrageously risk-ridden in terms of infection, incidents of covered up abortion hackery, even unreported deaths of women which are later blamed on the emergency care they get at regular hospitals after an abortion went wrong, emotional devastation of losing a child, exponential rates of suicide increase, and the like. The side trying to stop abortion think that they are protecting women's health also. The "they are throwing women under the bus" people are stuck, like the evangelical Christian above, in the paradigm. It's free, it's about a woman's body, it must all be good. It isn't.
Before there is a Senate vote each Senator should go inside a Planned Parenthood clinic. Like a Raid. Each one should go and look at the state of sterilization of equipment and get the medical credentials of each 'doctor' who conducts abortions. Further they should send teams of people in to see what percentage of clinics actually even have any equipment to conduct mammogram testing or pre cancer screening and what they charge for it compared to the going rate at the local hospital or university clinic.
Then they should decide if the money is better spent on putting free cancer screening health clinics attached to major hospitals that have health controls, or university clinics, and segregate this from the influences of the abortion industry- the -we will keep you on the bus so we can carve the life out of you for profit- people.
There was once a professional who thought he was being religiously persecuted as an evangelical Christian at his high level job. His co-workers on the other hand claim that he had been just objectively offensive, insulting and rude repeatedly. It was personality and had nothing to do with evangelizing. Every time some incident occurred the client thought it was the religious persecution (and he was owed money under a statute precluding it) and the coworkers insisted on their belief that he was just being a jerk and most unChristian. It was impossible for the protagonist to see beyond his paradigm construction and try to see things from the other side's perspective. The more heated it got, the more money he demanded.
I look at that scenario and look at what happened over the Planned Parenthood abortion riders in the budget impasse. The Planned Parenthood people kept insising that they -the bad republicans- were just trying to 'throw women under the bus' and deny and deprive them of free "health care", which included abortion. The other side insisted that abortion is not "health care" for anyone, it is murder of a pre-born yet quite human life, and all the other so called 'benefits' offered by Planned Parenthood for women like mammograms, cancer screenings, etc. were smokescreens, overstated statistically and further, any money supposedly going to that 'free health care' would funnel into abortions one way or another as the clinics expanded exponentially as money is fungible.
The "they are throwing women under the bus" side could not see that abortion is damaging and dangerous to women, and done in unregulated places like Planned Parenthood is outrageously risk-ridden in terms of infection, incidents of covered up abortion hackery, even unreported deaths of women which are later blamed on the emergency care they get at regular hospitals after an abortion went wrong, emotional devastation of losing a child, exponential rates of suicide increase, and the like. The side trying to stop abortion think that they are protecting women's health also. The "they are throwing women under the bus" people are stuck, like the evangelical Christian above, in the paradigm. It's free, it's about a woman's body, it must all be good. It isn't.
Before there is a Senate vote each Senator should go inside a Planned Parenthood clinic. Like a Raid. Each one should go and look at the state of sterilization of equipment and get the medical credentials of each 'doctor' who conducts abortions. Further they should send teams of people in to see what percentage of clinics actually even have any equipment to conduct mammogram testing or pre cancer screening and what they charge for it compared to the going rate at the local hospital or university clinic.
Then they should decide if the money is better spent on putting free cancer screening health clinics attached to major hospitals that have health controls, or university clinics, and segregate this from the influences of the abortion industry- the -we will keep you on the bus so we can carve the life out of you for profit- people.
Friday, April 08, 2011
How Long?
How Long Did you all think that the country was going to tolerate an entire party held hostage by a powerful lobby of sleazy abortion providers who couldn't get real jobs in real hospitals if their lives depended on it? How long did you all think the country would be dupped into thinking that the planned parenthood advertising half represented what they really do? How long do you think people were going to buy Harry Reid saying it's all their fault for not wanting abortions covered under Federal Funding when he knows full well that there are no Chinese Walls regulating allocations of budgeting oversight in any Planned Parenthood office. You are all incredibly strategically blind. This isn't flying further than Orville Wright in a blizzard. The DEMs are going to pay for this big time- no one blames the Republicans for insisting that the Planned Parenthood Fraud game is up. No one blames them.
Planned Non Parenthood's
Political Slush Fund Strategy Looks like it is easy: just wildly overbill (an educated guess)- 300 Mil FOR WHAT HARRY!. http://www.citizenlink.com/2010/07/07/9th-circuit-keeps-alive-case-against-planned-parenthood/
What Harry Doesn't GET
and the DEMS refuse to Listen To. THEY DON'T DO CANCER SCREENINGS AT PLANNED PARENTHOOD. If you want to give women free pap smears give 300 MIL to Georgetown Hospital and fund a free medical clinic at the Lombardi Cancer Center for free cancer screenings/paps/mamograms. PLANNED PARENTHOOD DOES NOT DO FREE CANCER SCREENINGS. Total Disinformation. Total Lies. Total House of Crap.
Free Speech, Religious Toleration and Provacateur Fundamental Christians
What if they burned a Bible? The Catholic Conference of Bishops in Pakistan is outraged that the Protestant Pastor in Florida actually did participate in a Koran burning and wants him punished. At least detained. Something. Because it is all over You Tube and foreseeably will incite a riot-or worse-Christians get killed in those parts. I t has already taken on negative repurcussions elsewhere. http://www.cathstan.org/main.asp?SectionID=2&SubsectionID=26&ArticleID=4491 Or should we say-hey we have free speech here-we can do what we want ? Even when it incites murder elsewhere in the world? Who knows what the constitutional First Amendment says about that? Sounds like fodder for a few law review articles. Assault and battery on books isn't a crime- but what about when it is foreseeable to incite murder?
CRIMINAL
Charges Against Planned Parenthood And the gov't is supposed to give them 300 Mil- ??? For what? BAIL? http://www.operationrescue.org/archives/107-criminal-charges-against-planned-parenthood-finally-move-forward/ READ THE COMPLAINT http://operationrescue.org/pdfs/PPcomplaint.pdf READ THE COMPLAINT. This is what you want the feds subsidizing? This is what the DEMS are holding the government hostage to? Beyond RIDICULOUS- really immoral.
Cecile Richards
You are Full of Crap Hate to name you by name but you remind of the slick women that corporations hire to fight against sexual harassment allegations- You are full of crap. Women go to their doctors, university clinics for their medical care when they want a child. They don't go to Planned Parenthood- you know you are full of it- that is not why people go to planned parenthood. If the government wanted to fund FREE health care for women they should pour 300 mil. into regulated, recognized medical schools, universities, and hospitals, not Planned Non Parenthood. Not a private monopolistic corporation that is insulated from med. mal suits. Who goes to Planned Parenthood to have a healthy child. NO ONE. People go there for abortions. They don't go there for condoms- they go to the drug store for that. They don't go there for pregnancy testing- they get a test at the CVS for $7.00 and if it is positive and they want the child they go to a regular physician, not planned parenthood. Sickening. Go Away.
Not A Penny To
Planned Non Parenthood It is a cesspool of coverups of statutory rape of underaged girls too shamed to report it. It is a cesspool of medical malpractice and negligence of women butchered and too shamed to report it. It is an unregulated mess. It is a scandal. The Feds have no business funding what some people consider arguably a RICO enterprise that will loop in some dem campaign contributions. It is disgusing that the Dems are holding up a budget for this and easily traceable to Emily's List and other circuitously funnelled campaign contributions. Someone is predictably going to sue Emily's List for RICO violations. http://www.abortionprolife.com/Pro-life_Abortion_Contorversy ABSOLUTELY NO FEDERAL MONEY FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD. What other corporations, monopolies get 300 Mil by name without any regulation and threaten to hold up an entire govt budget? DISGUSTING. It's not about women's health. At All. http://www.lifenews.com/2009/01/01/state-3269/ http://demoncraticnation.com/2011/02/03/planned-parenthood-in-violation-of-federal-rico-laws-but-not-being-prosecuted/
Are They Kidding?
Planned Non Parenthood
Is an unregulated slaughterhouse franchise. There are more regulations governing how a meat packing plant has to butcher beef and sanitation requirements regarding food handling than Planned Parenthood has. It is not a women's health center, it is a women's mutilation lab. They do not offer mamograms for breast cancer screening.
It is lie. Go send any incognito person into a Planned parenthood looking for a free mamogram and they will tell you they do not do it there. They don't have the equipment.
Since when do the Feds give hundreds of millions of dollars to a totally unregulated enterprise without any oversight whatsoever? Don't tell me the funds can't go to abortion by law so three hundred million dollars are not going to support abortions or the equipment or infrastructure.
The Republican Rider is sane. The Democrats, yes, you Schumer, are being ridiculous. It's really enough to make me want to change parties for good.
Is an unregulated slaughterhouse franchise. There are more regulations governing how a meat packing plant has to butcher beef and sanitation requirements regarding food handling than Planned Parenthood has. It is not a women's health center, it is a women's mutilation lab. They do not offer mamograms for breast cancer screening.
It is lie. Go send any incognito person into a Planned parenthood looking for a free mamogram and they will tell you they do not do it there. They don't have the equipment.
Since when do the Feds give hundreds of millions of dollars to a totally unregulated enterprise without any oversight whatsoever? Don't tell me the funds can't go to abortion by law so three hundred million dollars are not going to support abortions or the equipment or infrastructure.
The Republican Rider is sane. The Democrats, yes, you Schumer, are being ridiculous. It's really enough to make me want to change parties for good.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)