Friday, September 11, 2015
Monday, September 07, 2015
Sunday, September 06, 2015
Illegal Immigrant
The Most Famous Illegal Immigrant Without Papers
Was Jesus.
When Jesus was born Herod called on a violent jealous retribution against what he perceived threatened his power- he sought to kill all the children under two years of age in Bethlehem. He slaughtered all the small children who looked around 2 yrs old in an entire town.
Joseph took Mary who had just delivered a baby and they traveled to Egypt and were illegal aliens, refugees from conflict/war from their home "state" of Israel, leaving behind everything, their parents, their belongings, their home in Nazareth to travel to Egypt.
Scripture tells us that Jesus as an infant lived in Egypt until his father Joseph felt it safe enough to return to Nazareth. We believe this was several years where he lived under cover as it were as a migrant, an illegal alien in Egypt.
Pope Francis has now called on every Parish in Europe and every Monastery to accommodate the refugees fleeing war in Syria and house them. Space is a Luxury. If you have taken a vow of poverty and have space to let someone throw a mattress on the floor you should give it to them. In fact, you should make it as nice as you would want to live in- because that is what it means to "do to your neighbor as you want done to you." You should house, clothe, feed and shelter these people, of any and all religions, because that is what it means to be a Christian.
Was Jesus.
When Jesus was born Herod called on a violent jealous retribution against what he perceived threatened his power- he sought to kill all the children under two years of age in Bethlehem. He slaughtered all the small children who looked around 2 yrs old in an entire town.
Joseph took Mary who had just delivered a baby and they traveled to Egypt and were illegal aliens, refugees from conflict/war from their home "state" of Israel, leaving behind everything, their parents, their belongings, their home in Nazareth to travel to Egypt.
Scripture tells us that Jesus as an infant lived in Egypt until his father Joseph felt it safe enough to return to Nazareth. We believe this was several years where he lived under cover as it were as a migrant, an illegal alien in Egypt.
Pope Francis has now called on every Parish in Europe and every Monastery to accommodate the refugees fleeing war in Syria and house them. Space is a Luxury. If you have taken a vow of poverty and have space to let someone throw a mattress on the floor you should give it to them. In fact, you should make it as nice as you would want to live in- because that is what it means to "do to your neighbor as you want done to you." You should house, clothe, feed and shelter these people, of any and all religions, because that is what it means to be a Christian.
Friday, September 04, 2015
Wednesday, September 02, 2015
May it Please the Court-Have You Lost Your Minds?
That is what I want to say to Judges who make people accommodate gay marriage demands. But of course I won't-i might be locked up for contempt. That's what happened to one poor marriage clerk registrar in Kentucky-for violating a Court Order. That of course cannot be tolerated and Judges of course can't stand it when it happens, but look at what is at issue really.
Forcing anyone to capitulate to gay marriage in their official duties or by mandating services to them is a clear violation of the First Amendment Establishment Clause and in some cases the 13th Amendment against forced labor (in the case of forcing people to bake cakes) many argue.
No one should be under any illusion that gay marriage is considered moral by Jewish law or Christian scripture. Gay sex is called an "abomination" and a "detestable act", it is rendered equal to "drunkenness" in precluding entry into the Kingdom of God. It is considered so corruptive of society and morality anyone committing acts of gay sex in jewish law had to be put to death by stoning.
Gay sex is considered against 3,000 years of Jewish law and tradition with a penalty actually written in Jewish teaching of death- by stoning for men sleeping with men. If you doubt it- look what they do to gays in the middle east now. Traditional Muslim cultures in the Middle East more closely reflect first century Jewish attitudes.
People who say "Jesus never said anything against it" are clear morons. I can't even be nice about this. During the first century Jewish law held that gays had to be stoned to death. Sodom and Gomhorah were not metaphors. They were real towns that were wiped off the map such that nothing grows there because of the gay sex practiced there aggressively. In fact the names Sodom and Gomhorah mean in Hebrew "burned" and "buried" because they were leveled in a firestorm and brimstone sh^*$fest likely caused by earthquakes releasing natural gas explosions.
Do you think if they were stoning people engaged in this around Jesus that he might speak against the practice or say nice things about gay sex? He never did. To quote the Savage Dan, "Jesus never said a word about gay sex." So that should tell you that he never overturned the law on the subject. He never said Jews were too harsh and not sympathetic with it- because that would be like saying Jews were too mean toward drunks or "licentious" adulterers. It was clear sin. It is clear sin.
So to force ANYONE who has a clear religious objection against catering to what is viewed clearly immoral is a First Amendment constitutional violation of Equal Protection.
And furthermore, its nasty. Its really sick and twisted. Its nothing at all like discrimination against Blacks and the hijacking of the civil rights movement by screaming gays is obnoxious and inapposite.
Watching this all unfold into insane persecution against bible believing Christians is disgusting and disturbing.
The law is now that gay marriage has to be recognized by all States as a constitutional right- but the law isn't that people who object have to sign the marriage certification or any paperwork having to do with it. So the people who object should be able to take their names off the seal without jeopardizing their jobs. There is a solution. And it isn't lock up everyone who can read the Bible.
Forcing anyone to capitulate to gay marriage in their official duties or by mandating services to them is a clear violation of the First Amendment Establishment Clause and in some cases the 13th Amendment against forced labor (in the case of forcing people to bake cakes) many argue.
No one should be under any illusion that gay marriage is considered moral by Jewish law or Christian scripture. Gay sex is called an "abomination" and a "detestable act", it is rendered equal to "drunkenness" in precluding entry into the Kingdom of God. It is considered so corruptive of society and morality anyone committing acts of gay sex in jewish law had to be put to death by stoning.
Gay sex is considered against 3,000 years of Jewish law and tradition with a penalty actually written in Jewish teaching of death- by stoning for men sleeping with men. If you doubt it- look what they do to gays in the middle east now. Traditional Muslim cultures in the Middle East more closely reflect first century Jewish attitudes.
People who say "Jesus never said anything against it" are clear morons. I can't even be nice about this. During the first century Jewish law held that gays had to be stoned to death. Sodom and Gomhorah were not metaphors. They were real towns that were wiped off the map such that nothing grows there because of the gay sex practiced there aggressively. In fact the names Sodom and Gomhorah mean in Hebrew "burned" and "buried" because they were leveled in a firestorm and brimstone sh^*$fest likely caused by earthquakes releasing natural gas explosions.
Do you think if they were stoning people engaged in this around Jesus that he might speak against the practice or say nice things about gay sex? He never did. To quote the Savage Dan, "Jesus never said a word about gay sex." So that should tell you that he never overturned the law on the subject. He never said Jews were too harsh and not sympathetic with it- because that would be like saying Jews were too mean toward drunks or "licentious" adulterers. It was clear sin. It is clear sin.
So to force ANYONE who has a clear religious objection against catering to what is viewed clearly immoral is a First Amendment constitutional violation of Equal Protection.
And furthermore, its nasty. Its really sick and twisted. Its nothing at all like discrimination against Blacks and the hijacking of the civil rights movement by screaming gays is obnoxious and inapposite.
Watching this all unfold into insane persecution against bible believing Christians is disgusting and disturbing.
The law is now that gay marriage has to be recognized by all States as a constitutional right- but the law isn't that people who object have to sign the marriage certification or any paperwork having to do with it. So the people who object should be able to take their names off the seal without jeopardizing their jobs. There is a solution. And it isn't lock up everyone who can read the Bible.
Tuesday, September 01, 2015
Monday, August 31, 2015
Sunday, August 30, 2015
Gabriel's Tears: The Religious Opposition Predicating a Constitutional Challenge to Planned Parenthood Funding
The Root of the Opposition is Deeply Religious.
Angels are believed to be assigned to children to watch over them in heaven according to some Christian tradition and religion.
When the Angel Gabriel was sent to the Virgin Mary he was giving her news of her pregnancy and also likely of his assignment.
The Angel Gabriel told the Virgin Mary-you are going to conceive and be with child. This was an announcement of something already known in heaven to happen in the future. Christians believe that God knows who children are going to be sent to earth through the DNA coding of a human before they are sent.
"I knew you before you were knit together in your mother's womb"- this is a bible verse from the Old or First Hebrew Testament.
So a pregnancy of a human is not some accident of biology however it is conceived. Children made in the image of God come from God and are sent by God through the instrumentality of human intercourse (and only in one case without it.)
Once Gabriel announced to the Virgin Mary she was going to conceive a child she had two choices. She chose to say Yes, bring it on- Let it be done to me as you have said.
She could have said "are you kidding! I am not married yet, look at this hovel of a one room apartment i live in-how do you expect me to raise a child in this- and where are we going to get the money, i'm still paying off student loans, it's my body my business, how dare you enslave me as a breeding machine to your power tripping male angel chauvinist mentality-i'm moving forward with my life, bugger off."
That might have started a different religion. And it appears it has- because that is the spiritual foundation of the Pro-Choice Religion.
Angels are believed to be assigned to children to watch over them in heaven according to some Christian tradition and religion.
When the Angel Gabriel was sent to the Virgin Mary he was giving her news of her pregnancy and also likely of his assignment.
The Angel Gabriel told the Virgin Mary-you are going to conceive and be with child. This was an announcement of something already known in heaven to happen in the future. Christians believe that God knows who children are going to be sent to earth through the DNA coding of a human before they are sent.
"I knew you before you were knit together in your mother's womb"- this is a bible verse from the Old or First Hebrew Testament.
So a pregnancy of a human is not some accident of biology however it is conceived. Children made in the image of God come from God and are sent by God through the instrumentality of human intercourse (and only in one case without it.)
Once Gabriel announced to the Virgin Mary she was going to conceive a child she had two choices. She chose to say Yes, bring it on- Let it be done to me as you have said.
She could have said "are you kidding! I am not married yet, look at this hovel of a one room apartment i live in-how do you expect me to raise a child in this- and where are we going to get the money, i'm still paying off student loans, it's my body my business, how dare you enslave me as a breeding machine to your power tripping male angel chauvinist mentality-i'm moving forward with my life, bugger off."
That might have started a different religion. And it appears it has- because that is the spiritual foundation of the Pro-Choice Religion.
Saturday, August 29, 2015
Legal Injustice
And the Constitution.
By all reasoned accounts, over half the country is of a religious view that an abortion kills or "terminates" a human life form, scientifically known to have separate and different DNA from the mother, which creates moral and spiritual consequences. Those people who hold that it is morally wrong, indefensible and obscene in cases to terminate a life in a womb believe that people who are terminating their pregnancies are killing In Womb Children (IWCs). People who believe it wrong to do this think this no less wrong because it is inside a womb than it would be to shoot dead an innocent person who wandered in your house because you left the door open. The mother is a host to the fetus and the fetus is not an extension of the mother's cellular structure-it is not a skin tag, a mole, a wart or a tumor. To force people who think it immoral to terminate or kill this on clear "religious" grounds to pay for people to do it by federal law is Unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
We currently live in a regime that is legally unjust. When the government is forcing people with clear religious convictions to pay for other people's murder of their IWCs, that is wrong, unjust and immoral and violates the Establishment Clause.
IWCs do not have full citizen status because of a minority religious view that holds that they are not "people" such that they should be considered legally protectable until they are born. When people who hold that minority religious view impose upon the people who do not the legal requirement to pay for other people murdering their IWCs, that is a regime that is morally insupportable, legally unjust and a clear violation of the Establishment Clause.
Planned Parenthood should be defunded. Whatever your view of people's "Choice" to murder, massacre, delimb and sell the pieces of In Womb Children, there is no legitimate legal support for forcing the entire country to pay for such an obscene abomination.
By all reasoned accounts, over half the country is of a religious view that an abortion kills or "terminates" a human life form, scientifically known to have separate and different DNA from the mother, which creates moral and spiritual consequences. Those people who hold that it is morally wrong, indefensible and obscene in cases to terminate a life in a womb believe that people who are terminating their pregnancies are killing In Womb Children (IWCs). People who believe it wrong to do this think this no less wrong because it is inside a womb than it would be to shoot dead an innocent person who wandered in your house because you left the door open. The mother is a host to the fetus and the fetus is not an extension of the mother's cellular structure-it is not a skin tag, a mole, a wart or a tumor. To force people who think it immoral to terminate or kill this on clear "religious" grounds to pay for people to do it by federal law is Unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
We currently live in a regime that is legally unjust. When the government is forcing people with clear religious convictions to pay for other people's murder of their IWCs, that is wrong, unjust and immoral and violates the Establishment Clause.
IWCs do not have full citizen status because of a minority religious view that holds that they are not "people" such that they should be considered legally protectable until they are born. When people who hold that minority religious view impose upon the people who do not the legal requirement to pay for other people murdering their IWCs, that is a regime that is morally insupportable, legally unjust and a clear violation of the Establishment Clause.
Planned Parenthood should be defunded. Whatever your view of people's "Choice" to murder, massacre, delimb and sell the pieces of In Womb Children, there is no legitimate legal support for forcing the entire country to pay for such an obscene abomination.
Friday, August 28, 2015
Wednesday, August 26, 2015
Must See TV
Please Watch This.
You probably have seen ultrasound stills. But have you ever seen a moving video of a fetus? Tell me this isn't a little child.
https://www.facebook.com/acmd.medoks/videos/945127462205474/?pnref=story
You probably have seen ultrasound stills. But have you ever seen a moving video of a fetus? Tell me this isn't a little child.
Чем занимаются малыши внутри у мам. Поразительное видео! Видео снято с помощью 3D УЗИ (http://goo.gl/8MY0W6)Ацмд-Медокс
Posted by Ацмд-Медокс on Friday, May 15, 2015
"I've SEEN HELL: ITS NOT A GOOD PLACE" Dr. Anthony Levatino -- CONVERTED: From Abortion Provider to Pro-Life Ac...
"One of the Worst Human Rights Abuses Of Our Time" Former Abortionist OBGYN doctor says and describes how he delimbed second term babies: "someone's son or daughter."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)