Dueling Marches around Abortion
reported in todays Washington Post. Campaign season heating up already.
Given that the best way to be pro-life is to actually have a baby, or be a guy who supports in a
consistent loving monogamous relationship (lets call it marriage) a woman having a child, I have only so much patience with the pontifications of people who would rather have intimate plural relationships with men. Life, if you are missing the oestrogen you might not get the impulse to propel yourself under an ongoing sixteen wheeler if your man slapped you silly and ran off with your best friend. Or---you may not appreciate housing something that makes you vomit daily only to learn that it is missing half its brain and has all of its major organs swimming somewhere near your spleen. That said---both sides have a point, and if they could sit down long enough to talk to each other they might discover what the point is. If we enter another season of idiotic unkind demonization of the other viewpoint (like how ridiculous that anyone would not appreciate that lack of a basic salary, job or educational opportunity might disincline someone from having a pregnancy to term---throw in your are only 15) I am going to take up watercolors again in the South of France. Because I can't stand it. If you don't look at what A-holes men can be you have totally missed why lots of women have abortions in the first place. No one gets pregnant alone. (or if they did, they did it on purpose and probably want it.)
No comments:
Post a Comment