Religious Freedom and Healthcare Reform from The Berkley Center on Vimeo.
The moderator guy on the left has a dog in the fight and wants his free contraception for his wife. He isn't apparently familiar with the National Cancer Institute reports, the FDA reports, those of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the vast literature on cancer effects of contraceptions. It isn't just about religion. It is about the government telling people to eat things that could kill them. Really. Not an understatement. The science is controversial. The jury is out on the Guttmacher agenda. Just by calling itself an "institute" doesn't negate their partisan mission which is stated on their webpage as follows: Guiding Principles A vision for the future. The Institute envisions a world in which all women and men have the ability to exercise their rights and responsibilities regarding sexual behavior, reproduction and family formation, freely and with dignity. Essential to this vision are societal respect for and protection of personal decision making with regard to the number and timing of pregnancies and births, as well as public- and private-sector policies that support individuals and couples in their efforts to become responsible and supportive parents, maintain stable family structures and balance parenting with other roles. Equally vital to the Institute’s vision are the eradication of gender inequality worldwide and the attainment of equal status, rights and responsibilities for women. A comprehensive view of sexual and reproductive health. The Institute regards sexual and reproductive health as encompassing a wide range of people’s needs from adolescence onward. The Institute works to protect, expand and equalize universal access to information, services and rights.....: (very pro choice, pro abortion partisan statement)

Basing HHS regs on a Guttmacher conclusion is begging the circularly reasoned question.