And Support for the Priestly Marriage Option
For the ones really in love with their one true Love. Father Cutie the "scandalized" priest in Miami who fell in love with a woman comes clean in his TV interview.
http://news.aol.com/article/priest-in-racy-photos-admits-affair/474450?icid=mainmaindl1link3http%3A%2F%2Fnews.aol.com%2Farticle%2Fpriest-in-racy-photos-admits-affair%2F474450
If you really love someone you don't just dismiss them, says Cutie (paraphrased) who affirms the value of celibacy but favors a "marriage option." He doesn't want to be the Postor Boy for lifting celibacy, which he values as an institutional vow. The "option" is what is important however to preserve for marriage (monogamous heterosexual) because the Holy Spirit does not give all the gift of celibacy for a lifetime- the Holy Spirit gives some that gift for a time, and later can give them the gift of a woman who really actually truly loves them. Killing off this option is killing off the Will of God for both people's lives.
The life, hopes, and heart of a woman is involved. If the church actually practiced LOVE,
the church would weigh the Hopes and Heart of a woman carefully and seriously and give it
great significance. Otherwise the Blessed MOTHER thinks you are a pathetic pretending joke. http://www.marriedpriests.org/
The notion that it is holier to go to coctail parties to suck up to suggar mommas pretending to make girlfriends out of a harem of the lonely ladies club to get the parish in their wills than to build a family with a woman you are in love with is just beyond pathetic. You all ought to be ashamed. Of course Cutie should be able to be married and not lose his job.
Here is his legal recourse: TITLE VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C 200oe et seq.. It is discriminatory to penalize someone for being a male who falls in love with a female in an employment context. It is gender discrimination against a particular type of male. It is in fact illegal in America to dismiss someone from a job because of a gender attribute.
I recommend he go to his nearest ACLU office. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/42/usc_sup_01_42_10_21_20_VI.html
[There is a religious org. exemption for "hire" in terms of hiring only those qualified by the religion, such that it isn't under the law discriminatory to not hire a female priest when the rules of the religion state priests must be males- that is written in the exemptions to the law- what IS NOT in the law is the exemption ability to FIRE someone or harm them in any aspect of employment (suspension, removal, termination, demotion, etc.) once they are hired and clearly qualified, because of being a male who then chooses to marry a female after in the employment. That appears to be gender discrimination-discrimination due to "sex" gender. It appears to be illegal and in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as Amended. This is not a legal opinion or advice and it is urged that a lawyer in the jurisdiction where one resides should provide the necessary advice. ]
THE MARRIAGE OPTION. A HEALTHIER CHURCH. A MORE LOVING CHURCH.
Jesus NEVER made a qualification of office of any disciple, apostle or follower that they MUST mandatorily remain lifetime celibates to serve as "priests" apostles, followers or disseminators of his body and blood. JPII admited it.
No comments:
Post a Comment